x
schencka
The HigherEd Nonprofit vs. For-profit debate

...a continuation on my previous post.

There is something real and genuine that comes from reading good books and discussing them with other people who have read said books. I can't name it, I can't "brand" it, and I can't sell it.

But I know it's there.

Online for-profits are more agile institutions that react to market demands. I'm comfortable with that. I work at such an institution.

But the nonprofits engender and continue ("sell" in the parlance) a lineage, from Homer to Thomas More to Melville to today's leading thinkers, from Newton to Darwin to Einstein to Stephen Hawking. From Plato and Aristotle to Kant, Hegel, and Heidegger. PhD professors take passing on this lineage as seriously as do priests passing on their vocation. Do the PhD programs at the for-profits feel this grave?

There is something essentially bankrupt in purely practical learning. It makes us more economical but does not create meaning. Improved methods of genocide by the Nazis were a technological breakthrough, but a heinous, horrible, unimaginable one -- a practical breakthrough that never should have been. So too for the atomic bomb.

Advancement without understanding is meaningless. Educational models matter.
No profanes - sacred
 
Calendar

May 2017
123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031

April 2017
1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30

March 2017
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031


Older

Recent Visitors

May 24th
google

May 23rd
almost23
google

May 22nd
google

May 21st
google

May 20th
google

May 19th
google

May 18th
c4fine13u22
google

May 17th
google

May 16th
divine
google

May 14th
google

May 13th
google

May 12th
google
Spread Firefox