x
schencka
The Appeal of Obama



Reading today's newspaper, there has been a lot of ink and a lot of TV time for the Senators who questioned David Petraeus and Ryan Crocker about the progress of the Iraq War.

I watched much of it on C-SPAN, in the middle of the day. Obama was the only person to say anything creative the whole day, as far as I could tell. This was his argument: If the surge has been a "success," then if the same level of violence could be maintained without US involvement -- i.e. Iraqi forces maintaining the current level of "fragile" and "reversible" peace -- then could the mission be declared a success.

Obama's analysis was that of a creative lawyer and critically-thinking academic. "I'm trying to get a sense of what we could call success," he said (paraphrase), and insinuating that the current stated goals for Iraq are pie-in-the-sky: it's quite apparent that after five years, Iraq is never going to be 1) a democratic ally of the US and Israel; 2) free of Iranian influence; and 3) peaceful and functioning like a Western developed country.

Democratic President candidate Barack Obama is the only person who has suggested a reasonable goal for success in Iraq. He is the only politician prepared to admit that Iraq will never look like we want it to. He's the only leader who can do what is necessary for the benefit of both Iraq and the United States: reach a reasonable level of violence, declare victory, and leave Iraq -- and focus on building our country instead of flushing taxes and deficit down a toilet.
 
Calendar

March 2017
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031

January 2017
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031

December 2016
123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031


Older

Recent Visitors

March 24th
google

March 23rd
google

March 22nd
google

March 21st
almost23
google

March 20th
google

March 19th
google

March 18th
google

March 17th
google

March 16th
bandgeek24
google

March 15th
google
jakerad
Spread Firefox