x
schencka
Reading: Leslie A. Fiedler, _Love and Death in the American Novel_
My first encounter with the man was through a video about Shakespeare; he intimated homosexual tendencies in The Sonnets by, I think, by dissecting many critics' use of a nondenial denial. Then, later, I heard of news that he had died, and, checking him up on Google, found that his CV was actually still up on the web, like a more-appropriate tombstone.

Thusly I begin reading his most famous work, a book from an era when non-academics actually read books of criticism, and also, a book from a time when English professors and literary culture were distinct. (Maybe this is why many English depts. house real assholes and are now being pushed aside to oblivion by the Right.) The introduction to Love and Death said the first half of that.

I've read the beginning parts, up to page 38. Fiedler has that magnanimous touch for the subtle generalization; he's thought this through, or is beginning to in a real fashion, and writes what he thinks, and you should believe for that. It's a charismatic mode of writing, and I, for one, am under its spell.

Prof Lynda Zwinger says it's where any debate about American literature, and American studies for that matter, starts, and now I see why. Fiedler talks, or writes, with figuration--that is to say, he makes figures out of academic-y things (i.e. "the pursuit of 'truth'", Rousseau, Napoleon, T. Jefferson) and fits them into his compelling narrative of the basis of the Idea of America: its contradictions, ambiguities. And as critic, he seeks to answer these problems, or at least point them out for the sake of pointing them out.

The arguments are compelling. The "new" America is an extension of her/his European forebears, but distinct, who in its infancy refuses the romantic love narrative and instead tells stories of men going off with other men (many times a dark-skinned man) to avoid the "civilized" crushing responsibilities of wooing, marriage, and children. And escaping not to a place of innocence (nature), but to a place of gothic indifference and horror (the real nature). The ambiguity at the center of all this is America's unresolved relation to the black and the American Indian, and the problem of hamstrung sexuality partly due to the uptightness of the puritanism.

The book (up to page 38) seems more a promontory step towards that bugaboo of mine called Ameican Studies (a bugaboo, of course, because of my difficulties with famous American Studies scholar Annette Kolodny--a Famous person). But in the rebellious, charismatic long hair and Henry Miller-esque manque of Fiedler, American studies transfixes me, and spurs me to read that 700-pager Or: The Whale, known to most as Moby Dick. --adam
No profanes - sacred
 
Calendar

March 2017
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031

January 2017
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031

December 2016
123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031


Older

Recent Visitors

March 24th
google

March 23rd
google

March 22nd
google

March 21st
almost23
google

March 20th
google

March 19th
google

March 18th
google

March 17th
google

March 16th
bandgeek24
google

March 15th
google
jakerad
Spread Firefox