Paul Krugman also reads Glenn Greenwald
Paul Krugman picks up on Greenwald's point that General Petraeus is no Objective Oracle.
Most damning may be the fact that Petraeus is more wonk -- writer on military strategy -- than soldier. Petraeus has never been in combat.
"Charge those guns! I'll stick back here in the Green Zone, thankyouverymuch."
All the President's Enablers
By PAUL KRUGMAN
In a coordinated public relations offensive, the White House is using
reliably friendly pundits — amazingly, they still exist — to put out
the word that President Bush is as upbeat and confident as ever. It
might even be true.
What I don't understand is why we're supposed to consider Mr. Bush's
continuing confidence a good thing.
Remember, Mr. Bush was confident six years ago when he promised to
bring in Osama, dead or alive. He was confident four years ago, when
he told the insurgents to bring it on. He was confident two years ago,
when he told Brownie that he was doing a heckuva job.
Now Iraq is a bloody quagmire, Afghanistan is deteriorating and the
Bush administration's own National Intelligence Estimate admits, in
effect, that thanks to Mr. Bush's poor leadership America is losing
the struggle with Al Qaeda. Yet Mr. Bush remains confident.
Sorry, but that's not reassuring; it's terrifying. It doesn't
demonstrate Mr. Bush's strength of character; it shows that he has
lost touch with reality.
Actually, it's not clear that he ever was in touch with reality. I
wrote about the Bush administration's "infallibility complex," its
inability to admit mistakes or face up to real problems it didn't want
to deal with, in June 2002. Around the same time Ron Suskind, the
investigative journalist, had a conversation with a senior Bush
adviser who mocked the "reality-based community," asserting that "when
we act, we create our own reality."
People who worried that the administration was living in a fantasy
world used to be dismissed as victims of "Bush derangement syndrome,"
liberals driven mad by Mr. Bush's success. Now, however, it's a
syndrome that has spread even to former loyal Bushies.
Yet while Mr. Bush no longer has many true believers, he still has
plenty of enablers — people who understand the folly of his actions,
but refuse to do anything to stop him.
This week's prime example is Senator Richard Lugar of Indiana, who
made headlines a few weeks ago with a speech declaring that "our
course in Iraq has lost contact with our vital national security
interests." Mr. Lugar is a smart, sensible man. He once acted
courageously to head off another foreign policy disaster, persuading a
reluctant Ronald Reagan to stop supporting Ferdinand Marcos, the
corrupt leader of the Philippines, after a stolen election.
Yet that political courage was nowhere in evidence when Senate
Democrats tried to get a vote on a measure that would have forced a
course change in Iraq, and Republicans responded by threatening a
filibuster. Mr. Lugar, along with several other Republicans who have
expressed doubts about the war, voted against cutting off debate,
thereby helping ensure that the folly he described so accurately in
his Iraq speech will go on.
Thanks to that vote, nothing will happen until Gen. David Petraeus,
the top commander in Iraq, delivers his report in September. But don't
expect too much even then. I hope he proves me wrong, but the
general's history suggests that he's another smart, sensible enabler.
I don't know why the op-ed article that General Petraeus published in
The Washington Post on Sept. 26, 2004, hasn't gotten more attention.
After all, it puts to rest any notion that the general stands above
politics: I don't think it's standard practice for serving military
officers to publish opinion pieces that are strikingly helpful to an
incumbent, six weeks before a national election.
In the article, General Petraeus told us that "Iraqi leaders are
stepping forward, leading their country and their security forces
courageously." And those security forces were doing just fine: their
leaders "are displaying courage and resilience" and "momentum has
gathered in recent months."
In other words, General Petraeus, without saying anything falsifiable,
conveyed the totally misleading impression, highly convenient for his
political masters, that victory was just around the corner. And the
best guess has to be that he'll do the same thing three years later.
You know, at this point I think we need to stop blaming Mr. Bush for
the mess we're in. He is what he always was, and everyone except a
hard core of equally delusional loyalists knows it.
Yet Mr. Bush keeps doing damage because many people who understand how
his folly is endangering the nation's security still refuse, out of
political caution and careerism, to do anything about it.