x
schencka
Book on the intra-South slavery debate

Link.

In dismissing the stale notions that slaveholder paternalism developed from the ancient habit of noblesse oblige or from the peculiar conditions of Southern slavery, Ford makes his most important contribution to our understanding of the development of Southern society. He demonstrates that paternalism was made, not born, the product of an intense, if often bewildering debate among the slaveholders themselves.
...
The problem, however, was that paternalism was a fiction. Slaves understood that the plantation was no community and the master no father; the actions of the slaveholders revealed that they did as well. When periodic insurrections and insurrection scares made it clear that paternalism did notcreate “hard-working, loyal and well-behaved” slaves, masters returned to the fist, lash and noose. All of which suggests that whatever the regional differences were among slave­holders, the ownership of slaves did in fact pull them together. Slaveholdersin the upper and lower South may have shared only their opposition to abolition, but that was enough.

No profanes - sacred
 
Calendar

March 2017
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031

January 2017
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031

December 2016
123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031


Older

Recent Visitors

March 25th
google

March 24th
google

March 23rd
google

March 22nd
google

March 21st
almost23
google

March 20th
google

March 19th
google

March 18th
google

March 17th
google

March 16th
bandgeek24
google

March 15th
google
Spread Firefox