x
schencka
Book on the intra-South slavery debate

Link.

In dismissing the stale notions that slaveholder paternalism developed from the ancient habit of noblesse oblige or from the peculiar conditions of Southern slavery, Ford makes his most important contribution to our understanding of the development of Southern society. He demonstrates that paternalism was made, not born, the product of an intense, if often bewildering debate among the slaveholders themselves.
...
The problem, however, was that paternalism was a fiction. Slaves understood that the plantation was no community and the master no father; the actions of the slaveholders revealed that they did as well. When periodic insurrections and insurrection scares made it clear that paternalism did notcreate “hard-working, loyal and well-behaved” slaves, masters returned to the fist, lash and noose. All of which suggests that whatever the regional differences were among slave­holders, the ownership of slaves did in fact pull them together. Slaveholdersin the upper and lower South may have shared only their opposition to abolition, but that was enough.

No profanes - sacred
 
Calendar

April 2017
1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30

March 2017
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031

January 2017
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031


Older

Recent Visitors

April 22nd
google

April 21st
google

April 20th
google

April 19th
c4fine13u22
google

April 18th
google

April 17th
google

April 16th
google

April 15th
google

April 14th
google

April 13th
google
insanereid
deeterz
Spread Firefox