x
schencka
IHE comment

I commend Dean Dad's position on plagiarism overall. However, when he writes that "The argument about adjunct status strikes me as similarly misplaced. It mistakes compensation for the nature of the task at hand," I think he confuses compensation, or how much the adjunct gets paid, with the adjunct's disposability. In my experience, the only currency an adjunct instructor has is in how seldom his or her students complain to administrators. Great teachers who generate complaints do not last, and even adjuncts with low student survey numbers are retained unless they generate face-to-face complaints which eat up administrators' time.

It's not about the money, but in how quickly and easily adjuncts can be fired, or not offered new sections next term. Smart adjuncts who want to continue working learn to overlook plagiarism or don't search too hard, and those who respect themselves institute what Dean Dad calls "frontier justice," or dealing with each plagiarism case separate from administrative processes.

Regarding plagiarism, adjunctification has resulted in a weakening of academic rigor. You can't casualize a class of workers without lowering the respect they earn from the public. In higher education today, "retention" is more important than "standards."

No profanes - sacred
 
Calendar

March 2017
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031

January 2017
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031

December 2016
123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031


Older

Recent Visitors

March 27th
google

March 26th
google

March 25th
commntyblackman
google

March 24th
google

March 23rd
google

March 22nd
google

March 21st
almost23
google

March 20th
google

March 19th
google

March 18th
google

March 17th
google
Spread Firefox