x
schencka
Inside higher ed comment

Link.

"...[A]djunct instructors and are hired to handle a shortfall in the employer's workforce and this is one of the advantages to the employer...."

Adjunct-contingent employment is all about exploitation -- administrators gaming the system to block access to health insurance, fair pay, and pensions. Everyone knows that next semester, next year, and next decade, someone will need to teach the courses, and everyone knows that it will be the same exploited workers teaching the courses. Yet we continue this ridiculous dance of "firing" and "rehiring" the laborers every academic term.

"Many adjuncts are more talented and fulfill their teaching responsibilities in better fashion that some of the full-timers.But that is no basis for identifying with those positions on the basis of similar academic degrees or similar job requirements...."

Huh? One set of laborers 1) do the same work as the full-timers, and 2) in some cases do better work, yet the part-timers are not entitled to equal compensation?

I was once a full-time higher education instructor with similar ideas: Why don't the adjuncts just get better jobs? Why the constant complaints, etc.? Now that I'm in Adjunct Hell, I realize I was having those thoughts because I knew how close I was to getting sucked into the meat grinder. Now that I'm in it, the only way out is to advocate for fair treatment for adjunct-contingent laborers.

No profanes - sacred
 
Calendar

May 2017
123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031

April 2017
1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30

March 2017
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031


Older

Recent Visitors

May 25th
google

May 24th
google

May 23rd
almost23
google

May 22nd
google

May 21st
google

May 20th
google

May 19th
google

May 18th
c4fine13u22
google

May 17th
google

May 16th
divine
google

May 14th
google

May 13th
google
Spread Firefox